Latest | News

Supreme Court Pick Has Often Favored Employers in Labor Cases

A federal appeals-court panel split in 2014 over a case involving a grisly theme-park death, ruling 2-1 that the Labor Department was on sound footing when it sanctioned SeaWorld Entertainment Inc. for safety violations after a trainer was attacked by a killer whale.

The two judges upholding the sanction said that while whale-training is a dangerous occupation, SeaWorld could have taken steps to reduce the hazard. One of those judges was Merrick Garland, the Obama Supreme Court nominee whom Senate Republicans declined to consider after Justice Antonin Scalia died in 2016.

In dissent was Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s current nominee for the high court. Judge Kavanaugh said the case raised the question of “when should we as a society paternalistically decide” whether people who choose to work in risky sports and entertainment fields “must be protected from themselves.”

The case is one of more than 30 involving labor or workplace disputes for which Judge Kavanaugh wrote opinions during his 12-year tenure on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, seen as the nation’s second most powerful after the Supreme Court. He often has favored employers, sometimes embracing positions that other colleagues found too broad or conservative.

Read the full article at The Wall Street Journal.